The two men, Arian Taherzadeh and Haider Ali, were accused of posing as federal law enforcement officers and allegedly providing gifts to members of the Secret Service, including $ 40,000 rented apartments, surveillance systems, a drone, and law enforcement tools. law and other, court documents said. “All staff involved in this matter are on administrative leave and do not have access to Secret Service facilities, equipment and systems. The Secret Service adheres to the highest levels of professional standards and conduct and will remain in active coordination with the Ministries of Justice and “Homeland Security”, the Secret Service stated in a statement on Wednesday night. Taherzadegh and Ali are said to be posing as “Special Police”, claiming that they were “involved in secret gang-related investigations and that they were investigating the January 6 violence in the United States Capitol”, according to court documents that were unsealed. on Wednesday night. Taherzadeh went so far as to show someone identified in court documents as “Witness 1” an “HSI case file” on which they were “working” and marked “confidential”. They even went so far as to have identical Chevy Tahoes equipped with police lights. “TAHERZADEH told Witness 1 that as part of the recruitment process, TAHERZADEH would have to shoot Witness 1 with an air rifle to assess Witness 1’s response and tolerance of pain. According to Witness 1, because he believed that “He was part of the DHS / HSI recruitment process, agreed to be shot and then shot by TAHERZADEH. ALI was present during the shootings.” Taherzadeh sent Witness 2 several photographs of police equipment to his apartment. In the photo, pelican holsters, often used to carry firearms, appear on a shelf behind Taherzadeh. Another witness who was questioned in court documents, and is in the first lady’s records, was informed by Taherzadeh that he was in a “secret working group” and provided many favors to law enforcement residents. He also offered to give the anonymous witness an AR rifle. In addition, the anonymous agent of the Secret Service regarding the details of the first lady was informed by Taherzadeh that he had the same service weapon that the witness had. “TAHERZADEH came to the Witness 2 apartment carrying a Glock 19 Generation 5 in a Tactical Holster Ayin. TAHERZADEH said he had an extra case and wanted to give Witness 2 the Tactical Holster for the recently released Witness 2 Glock 19 Generation 5 is Wit. still has this case “. Another unnamed witness allegedly saw the Ministry of Homeland Security’s fraudulent computer and a certificate from the Taherzadeh Federal Training Center. The men told residents of the Navy Yard apartment complex where they were staying that they were renting DHS-paid apartments and set up a surveillance system around the apartment complex to which residents could access it at any time from their mobile device. “These residents stated that they believe that TAHERZADEH and ALI had access to the personal information of all the residents of the apartment complex.” Continuing his efforts to represent himself as a member of the DHS / HSI, Taherzadeh allegedly sent Witness 2 a photograph with an HSI “vest,” according to court documents. One witness believed the two men had passwords throughout the building because they were pretending to be police officers. Taherzadeh allegedly approached another DHS employee who worked for HSI. However, when the clerk searched for him in the database, he could not find him. The investigation began when the suspects witnessed an attack involving a letter carrier and were interviewed by Postal Inspectors. “The USPIS inspector provided this information to the Office of the Inspector General of DHS, which then referred the information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for further investigation. It was at this point that the FBI began its investigation, which confirmed residents’ statements received by the USPIS inspector “, the court documents state. The names of the members of the Secret Service who have been suspended have not been made public. The court documents do not state when these alleged interactions took place.
